<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.3-beta1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label</title>
	<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/</link>
	<description>musings, thoughts, and writings of Barbara W. Klaser</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.3-beta1</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label by: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10435</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10435</guid>
					<description>I recently read a study which proposed that the (verifiable) differences in the structure of men's brains versus women's brains predisposes women and men to different approaches to life, and therefore, to literature.

Really, I don't care if there are differences or not, nature or nuture,  What I do care about is the fact that one approach to life is denigrated, while the other taken as the highest example of the art:  women cook; men are chefs.  Men are authors; women are female authors.  Etc.  As Steinem said, the addition of the adjective is intended as a diminuition of the honorific.

I am also reminded of the way speakers are introduced:  May I present the lovely Mrs. So-and-so, wife and mother of two darling girls.  And by the way she is a professor of physics at the U. of Wherever.  The &quot;lovely&quot; and the &quot;wife&quot; and &quot;mother&quot; all remind us to put her in her biological frame, in which women are gauged by attractiveness and domestic utility.

I am not amused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I recently read a study which proposed that the (verifiable) differences in the structure of men&#8217;s brains versus women&#8217;s brains predisposes women and men to different approaches to life, and therefore, to literature.</p>
	<p>Really, I don&#8217;t care if there are differences or not, nature or nuture,  What I do care about is the fact that one approach to life is denigrated, while the other taken as the highest example of the art:  women cook; men are chefs.  Men are authors; women are female authors.  Etc.  As Steinem said, the addition of the adjective is intended as a diminuition of the honorific.</p>
	<p>I am also reminded of the way speakers are introduced:  May I present the lovely Mrs. So-and-so, wife and mother of two darling girls.  And by the way she is a professor of physics at the U. of Wherever.  The &#8220;lovely&#8221; and the &#8220;wife&#8221; and &#8220;mother&#8221; all remind us to put her in her biological frame, in which women are gauged by attractiveness and domestic utility.</p>
	<p>I am not amused.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label by: Creechman</title>
		<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10433</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10433</guid>
					<description>Kirsten Dunst is interesting because she's just good enough, still young enough, talented enough, to escape the &quot;chick flick&quot; label. Yet here comes Spiderman again.

&quot;Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind&quot; was clever. You must see that movie two or three times to get it.

The writers could have done better with the &quot;Wimbledon&quot; story, seeing they spent so much on special effects. I mean, how standard is the stock dad?

I thought &quot;Match Point,&quot; the Woody Allen movie with Scarlett Johansson, was better, if a bit operatic. Allen gets that way. Hammers us over the head with that or Jazz. &quot;Crimes and Misdemeanors,&quot; same way. Still, he's incredibly brilliant, writes it all.

I'm not a trapped man, but I want to be, before I turn fifty.

Creechman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Kirsten Dunst is interesting because she&#8217;s just good enough, still young enough, talented enough, to escape the &#8220;chick flick&#8221; label. Yet here comes Spiderman again.</p>
	<p>&#8220;Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind&#8221; was clever. You must see that movie two or three times to get it.</p>
	<p>The writers could have done better with the &#8220;Wimbledon&#8221; story, seeing they spent so much on special effects. I mean, how standard is the stock dad?</p>
	<p>I thought &#8220;Match Point,&#8221; the Woody Allen movie with Scarlett Johansson, was better, if a bit operatic. Allen gets that way. Hammers us over the head with that or Jazz. &#8220;Crimes and Misdemeanors,&#8221; same way. Still, he&#8217;s incredibly brilliant, writes it all.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not a trapped man, but I want to be, before I turn fifty.</p>
	<p>Creechman
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label by: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10294</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10294</guid>
					<description>Eric and Creechman --- 

Eric  wrote: &quot;I’d guess a lot of men find the idea of reading a book pretty unmanly. Seems to me a lot of male writers are actually a little uneasy about that. I’ve seen male writers who insist they are really businessmen, as if business is a more macho profession than writing books that real men are not going to read.&quot;

I'm certain the idea that anything a man engages in must earn money, or be practical, or be treated as a business is simply a carryover from outdated traditional roles, and that men are as trapped by roles from the past as women, in expectations that are handed down to us, or trained into us from the cradle. 

We all (including me) carry around these knee-jerk responses to new ideas. I think it's good for each of us to examine our reactions. 

Creechman, I know you're interested in tennis as well. Have you ever seen the movie &lt;em&gt;Wimbledon&lt;/em&gt;? It's one of my favorite romantic comedies, and one of my favorite sports-related movies. I suppose some would call it a &quot;chick flick&quot; --- but why? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Eric and Creechman &#8212; </p>
	<p>Eric  wrote: &#8220;I’d guess a lot of men find the idea of reading a book pretty unmanly. Seems to me a lot of male writers are actually a little uneasy about that. I’ve seen male writers who insist they are really businessmen, as if business is a more macho profession than writing books that real men are not going to read.&#8221;</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m certain the idea that anything a man engages in must earn money, or be practical, or be treated as a business is simply a carryover from outdated traditional roles, and that men are as trapped by roles from the past as women, in expectations that are handed down to us, or trained into us from the cradle. </p>
	<p>We all (including me) carry around these knee-jerk responses to new ideas. I think it&#8217;s good for each of us to examine our reactions. </p>
	<p>Creechman, I know you&#8217;re interested in tennis as well. Have you ever seen the movie <em>Wimbledon</em>? It&#8217;s one of my favorite romantic comedies, and one of my favorite sports-related movies. I suppose some would call it a &#8220;chick flick&#8221; &#8212; but why? <img src='http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label by: creechman</title>
		<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10287</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 13:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10287</guid>
					<description>I love &quot;chick flicks.&quot;

Romantic Comedies at this point require screen writers to really hone skills. I find it fascinating to watch how much better these movies get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I love &#8220;chick flicks.&#8221;</p>
	<p>Romantic Comedies at this point require screen writers to really hone skills. I find it fascinating to watch how much better these movies get.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label by: Eric Mayer</title>
		<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10257</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10257</guid>
					<description>Why men (or women) tend to like the sorts of movies or books they do beats me. I'd guess a lot of men find the idea of reading a book pretty unmanly. Seems to me a lot of male writers are actually a little uneasy about that. I've seen male writers who insist they are really businessmen, as if business is a more macho profession than writing books that real men are not going to read. And then there's all the violence and tough posturing in a lot of current books. But sitting at a computer writing tough doesn't make you tough. As for me I have absolutely no interest in firearms or cars. I was advised to read a book by a wildly well thought of author. The first chapter was nothing but guns and vehicles -- bang bang vroom vroom. Big deal. My eyes about glazed over. That was as far as I got in that book. So, the sorts of questions you're pondering, I'm the wrong person to state an opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why men (or women) tend to like the sorts of movies or books they do beats me. I&#8217;d guess a lot of men find the idea of reading a book pretty unmanly. Seems to me a lot of male writers are actually a little uneasy about that. I&#8217;ve seen male writers who insist they are really businessmen, as if business is a more macho profession than writing books that real men are not going to read. And then there&#8217;s all the violence and tough posturing in a lot of current books. But sitting at a computer writing tough doesn&#8217;t make you tough. As for me I have absolutely no interest in firearms or cars. I was advised to read a book by a wildly well thought of author. The first chapter was nothing but guns and vehicles &#8212; bang bang vroom vroom. Big deal. My eyes about glazed over. That was as far as I got in that book. So, the sorts of questions you&#8217;re pondering, I&#8217;m the wrong person to state an opinion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label by: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10248</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10248</guid>
					<description>violetismycolor --- I so agree that love is the stuff of life. Is the best part of life, love for one's significant other, for family, or for friends, or anyone for that matter, anything to be ashamed of? Not at all. I wouldn't want to live in a world without love.

Cathleen --- You're very welcome. Your book still has an honored place on my shelf, to be reread whenever I need a boost. Thanks so much for stopping by. Best wishes with your move to Paris. How exciting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>violetismycolor &#8212; I so agree that love is the stuff of life. Is the best part of life, love for one&#8217;s significant other, for family, or for friends, or anyone for that matter, anything to be ashamed of? Not at all. I wouldn&#8217;t want to live in a world without love.</p>
	<p>Cathleen &#8212; You&#8217;re very welcome. Your book still has an honored place on my shelf, to be reread whenever I need a boost. Thanks so much for stopping by. Best wishes with your move to Paris. How exciting!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label by: Cathleen Rountree</title>
		<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10245</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10245</guid>
					<description>Dear Barbara,
In Googling myself this morning (this is not as narcissistic as it sounds: I'm moving to Paris and wondered what kind of presence I have on the internet and how it can support my new undertakings), I came across your review of my book THE WRITER'S MENTOR on your June 2005 blog. What a lovely review. Thank you for writing and posting it! Congratulations on sticking with your blog for these long years. I admire your consistency. 

And thanks, too, for your entry on Gloria's wonderful suggestion re &quot;prick flicks.&quot; Pure genius! 

All good wishes, Cathleen 

PS My newest book, about developing community through movies, is THE MOVIE LOVERS' CLUB: HOW TO START YOUR OWN FILM GROUP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear Barbara,<br />
In Googling myself this morning (this is not as narcissistic as it sounds: I&#8217;m moving to Paris and wondered what kind of presence I have on the internet and how it can support my new undertakings), I came across your review of my book THE WRITER&#8217;S MENTOR on your June 2005 blog. What a lovely review. Thank you for writing and posting it! Congratulations on sticking with your blog for these long years. I admire your consistency. </p>
	<p>And thanks, too, for your entry on Gloria&#8217;s wonderful suggestion re &#8220;prick flicks.&#8221; Pure genius! </p>
	<p>All good wishes, Cathleen </p>
	<p>PS My newest book, about developing community through movies, is THE MOVIE LOVERS&#8217; CLUB: HOW TO START YOUR OWN FILM GROUP.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Gloria Steinem proposes a new film genre label by: violetismycolor</title>
		<link>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10240</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barbarawklaser.mysterynovelist.com/2007/07/09/gloria-steinem-proposes-a-new-film-genre-label/#comment-10240</guid>
					<description>I think the word 'chick-flick' is meant to be derisive and I find it a little insulting, as if love stories were somehow something we should be ashamed of.  I think love stories are the stuff of life and find (many of) them truly beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the word &#8216;chick-flick&#8217; is meant to be derisive and I find it a little insulting, as if love stories were somehow something we should be ashamed of.  I think love stories are the stuff of life and find (many of) them truly beautiful.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
